analysis - Why does Stockfish evaluates the trade of a B vs N that bad, while the trade has the King in the open and doubles pawns? - Chess Stack Exchange

Por um escritor misterioso

Descrição

In this position (White to play) (Picture credits to the chess compass extension that analyzes a chess.com game after it ended) The current Stockfish evaluation (before White plays) is ~0.0. But SF
analysis - Why does Stockfish evaluates the trade of a B vs N that bad,  while the trade has the King in the open and doubles pawns? - Chess Stack  Exchange
5666.8dd5ce54.5000x5000o.5a14a89e7b84.jpeg
analysis - Why does Stockfish evaluates the trade of a B vs N that bad,  while the trade has the King in the open and doubles pawns? - Chess Stack  Exchange
endgame - Why doesn't Stockfish evaluate this fortress as 0.0
analysis - Why does Stockfish evaluates the trade of a B vs N that bad,  while the trade has the King in the open and doubles pawns? - Chess Stack  Exchange
Videos - Internet Chess Club
analysis - Why does Stockfish evaluates the trade of a B vs N that bad,  while the trade has the King in the open and doubles pawns? - Chess Stack  Exchange
Videos - Internet Chess Club
analysis - Why does Stockfish evaluates the trade of a B vs N that bad,  while the trade has the King in the open and doubles pawns? - Chess Stack  Exchange
If I'm up two pawns, should I trade the other pieces and go for
analysis - Why does Stockfish evaluates the trade of a B vs N that bad,  while the trade has the King in the open and doubles pawns? - Chess Stack  Exchange
Chess Life 11.20 PDF, PDF, Abstract Strategy Games
de por adulto (o preço varia de acordo com o tamanho do grupo)